The Generation in the Spare Bedroom Is Reshaping Housing Demand
A growing share of prime-age renters and would-be first-time buyers are not in the market at all — but rather in their childhood bedrooms. And in some states, that sidelined cohort now approaches half of all 18 to 34-year-olds. For commercial real estate investors trying to read the next cycle of household formation and demand, the geography of this trend matters as much as the headline number.
One in three young adults off the market
According to a recent Visual Capitalist analysis based on 2024 American Community Survey data, 32.5% of U.S. adults aged 18 to 34 live in a parent’s home, up from 31.8% in 2023 and more than 10 percentage points higher than in 1960. That share nearly matches the recent historic peak of 34.5% reached in 2017, suggesting the brief post-pandemic dip was an interruption rather than a reversal.
Put differently, roughly one in three young adults who, in previous cycles, would have been renting small units, doubling up with roommates or entering starter-home subdivisions are currently absorbed into multi-generational households.
The national figure, though, obscures a striking spread between high and low-cost markets. In New Jersey, an estimated 44% of 18 to 34-year-olds live with a parent, while in North Dakota the share is just 12%. That 32-point gap marks a sharp geographic divergence in how quickly younger cohorts are moving into independent housing and where demand is being deferred rather than destroyed.
Who dominates the rankings?
The Visual Capitalist mapping shows high-cost coastal and Northeastern states dominating the top of the ranking, with New Jersey (44%), Connecticut (41%), New York (40%), Florida (40%), California (39%) and Maryland (38%) all posting shares far above the national average. Hawaii and Rhode Island each come in at 37%, followed by Massachusetts and Delaware at 36%.
At the other end, the lowest shares are found in North Dakota (12%), the District of Columbia (13%), and then South Dakota and Wyoming at 18% and Montana at 19%.
The distribution closely aligns with renter cost burdens. Analysis cited in the Visual Capitalist work, drawing on research from the National Association of Home Builders, finds that states where renters spend 30% or more of their income on housing also tend to have the highest proportions of young adults living at home.
In markets such as New Jersey, Connecticut, New York, California and Massachusetts—among the country’s most expensive rental markets—remaining in the parental home often becomes the least-bad option for young adults, even when they are employed.
For investors, those numbers point to delayed demand, not completely absent. High percentages of young adults living at home in gateway and coastal states are effectively a proxy for a backlog of smaller households that have yet to form, with implications for future absorption in both rental and entry-level for-sale product.
By contrast, the Great Plains and Mountain West—North Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming, Montana—look more like traditional formation markets, where lower housing costs translate into earlier exits from the parental home.
Need a Lease Agreement?
Access 150+ state-specific legal landlord forms, including a lease.
Metro pockets where the squeeze is most acute
Metro-level data deepens the story. Drawing on Pew Research Center analysis, the Visual Capitalist-linked research points to Vallejo, California and Oxnard–Thousand Oaks, California, where an estimated 33% of 25- to 34-year-olds live with their parents.
El Centro, California, is close behind at 32%, while Riverside, California, stands out for having about 22% of working adults aged 25 to 40 living at home. On the other side, metros such as Odessa, Texas and Lincoln, Nebraska, show rates around 3%.
Nine of the 10 metros with the highest shares of young adults at home are in California, Texas or Florida, underscoring how stretched affordability and wage-house price gaps are in those regional economies. For multifamily and single-family rental capital already concentrated in those Sun Belt and coastal metros, the data suggests a reservoir of latent demand building in the background while higher-for-longer rates and elevated rent-to-income ratios keep young adults from forming independent households at historic ages.
The skew is not only geographic. Pew’s analysis finds that among 25- to 34-year-olds nationally, 18% live in a parent’s home, with men more likely than women to do so—20% versus 15%. The numbers also include pronounced racial and ethnic differences.
Other research cited alongside the Visual Capitalist work notes that a majority of young adults who live with a parent describe the arrangement as positive for their finances, even as they view it less favorably for their social lives.
What it means for CRE
A Federal Reserve estimate referenced in the analysis suggests that living at home can save a young adult about $13,000 per year, money that can be directed toward student loans, emergency savings or a future down payment. From an investor’s perspective, that figure helps explain why the trend has persisted across multiple economic cycles: the financial incentive to delay independent living is substantial, especially amid high rents and rising ownership costs.
The near-term effect is a drag on demand at the lower end of the rental and for-sale markets, as millions of potential tenants and buyers remain in multi-generational households rather than forming new ones.
Over time, however, a prolonged period of elevated co-residence can translate into a bolus of better-capitalized young households entering the market when affordability or life stage finally forces a move, potentially reshaping demand profiles by product type and location.
With 2024 data already showing a reversal of the post-pandemic dip and economists expecting the share of young adults at home to remain elevated through the decade, the question for investors is less whether the cohort will show up in the market than where and in what form when it does.
Source: GlobeSt.
Accessibility